Tłumacznie pochodzi z translate.google.com.
Oficjalna wersja angielska portalu w przygotowaniu.

GTranslate

English French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish

Zmiana rozmiaru tekstu

-A A +A
ACCESS UPJP2

Publikacje pracownicze

L'individuazione del Superiore competente in ordine all’attuazione del can. 698 CIC/83
DANE PUBLIKACJI
Typ publikacjiArtykuł
Autoro. dr hab. Przemysław Michowicz
Język publikacjiinny
Data publikacji7-3-2016
Liczba arkuszy1
Strony23 - 39
AbstraktyEN
The paper proposes the constructive reflection on the possible procedural con-figuration inherent in the proceedings of dismissal, in particular consideration of the hypothesis exposed in the can. 698. The Legislator assures to the accused religious the right to communicate and to offer his proper defenses directly to the supreme Modera-tor of the Institute. The Author tries to indicate the competent religious Authorities in order to re-ceive the legal claim from the religious, accused for having committed crimes or ille-gal acts specified in the can. 695 and can. 696. Using the legal instruments like appeal and call to the proper jurisdiction – foreseen in the Code of canon law - helped to verify whether and how the exercise of the right to communicate with the supreme Moderator may be equivalent to the men-tioned procedural instruments. Unfortunately, the conclusions we reached do not allow assigning any nomen iuris to the hypothesis in which the demand submitted by the accused religious could be accept by the highest Authority of his proper Institute. Eventually, the Author proposed the possible solution of the specified doctri-nal problem. It is likely that the supreme Moderator, having determined his exclusive competence in order to lead the entire case and having communicated it to the Superi-or in loco, could have a burden to supplement the evidences and finalize the cause. It was also considered inopportune or inadvisable to accept the demand forwarded by the religious simultaneously with the notification of the arguments against him. It can’t be excluded another hypothesis according to which the same supreme Moderator will end the dispute using the extra canonical solutions.
Słowa kluczoweEN
right to defense, dismissal, competence, appeal, call to proper jurisdiction, religious Superior
DANE CZASOPISMA
Tytyłu czasopismaPrawo Kanoniczne
ISSN0551-911X
Identyfikator DOIDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/pk.2016.59.2.02
 
DANE KONFERENCJI
Państwo